SKINNER INSPIRED DI NOT A PROVEN WINNER FOR BLACKS \doc\web\99\13\rbo.txt Date sent: Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:45:10 -0400 From: anonymous Subject: Race-Baiting Ignores The Real Issue of Freedom You said: "The liberal educrats running the public school, who are largely middle class whites, embrace a reading methodology which empirical research clearly shows cannot help the majority of poverty class low achievers of color learn to read. Question: Does your "empirical research" distinguish between the effects of any particular reading methodology on blacks vs. whites? Are you suggesting that blacks learn differently, with a different inherent capability than whites? You said: "We are witnessing a widening bell curve gap between the literate middle class and the illiterate poverty class people mostly of color." Question: Are you suggesting that the gap is between the literate and illiterate, the middle class and poverty class, or all middle class and poor, illiterate minorities? Your equation as stated above brings many issues into play that cannot be blamed on race. You said: "And almost inevitably these children are in classes where "whole language" is used, and where little or almost no direct systematic instruction in teaching phonics is present." Question: Does your definition of "direct systematic instruction" include non-behavioral methods of direct instruction in teaching phonics, or do you deny any distinction between behaviorism (as in Skinnerian DI) and agency-based phonics instruction (as in Phyllis Schlafly's DI)? You said: "One central question is why universities and public school educators would reject experimental evidence about reading instruction..." Question: Do you really believe that Project Follow Through was a valid research experiment, given the unscientific advantages it awarded to certain groups and methods at the express exclusion of others? There has been no "scientific research" of the comparison between behavioral and agency-based direct instruction, because the government doesn't want to admit that phonics can be taught without operant conditioning. They perpetuate the lie that we must choose between whole language or Skinnerian-based Direct Instruction. The research being presented to educators is government-funded with an agenda to push, and that agenda has been the deliberate creation of a whole language crisis to be followed by the predetermined solution of behavioral methods. The truth is that behavioral direct instruction has not improved minority OR majority test scores beyond the first year, yet people are stubbornly advocating Skinnerian-based direct instruction anyway. There is no transfer of knowledge when students are conditioned to give a response via operant conditioning. There are schools using "direct systematic phonics instruction" that still have a 15-20% failure rate in the first year. How does the "scientific research data" explain that? Your logic suggests that 15% of blacks can't learn no matter what, or that there's a massive conspiracy by white educators to keep one race down. I would suggest that both are ignorant views! You said: "We are rapidly becoming two nations: one black and underachieving; the other middle class and mostly white." Question: What will you claim and who will you blame when operant conditioning fails to teach phonics to the remaining 20% of ALL children, including minorities? Will you still see it as a massive white conspiracy when the future workforce of all colors is dumbed down according to the needs of the economy, when "skills" are granted according to workforce development boards and 80% of all of society falls into the "worker drone" segment? When behavior is controlled by those wielding the most powerful incentives and "rewards" at the expense of individual agency, will you still be blinded by color alone? This is not a race war at all, it is a class war that involves everyone of every color. The blacks do not have exclusive claim to slavery issues, and that chip is serving as a major distraction to you. Get rid of it and treat everyone equally. Literacy and freedom are about agency, not race!