GAYS STEREOTYPED AS SUCCESSFUL, DILIGENT \doc\web\99\11\gayste.txt Homosexuals are among the wealthiest and most successful Americans. ..homosexuals have a reputation for being reliable workers whose abilities are sought after. ... most landlords I've met (including my current one) welcome homosexual tenants, who are known (a stereotype) for the excellent manner in which they maintain their premises. Date forwarded: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 01:09:56 -0400 (EDT) Date sent: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 01:10:35 -0400 From: Elizabeth Wright Send reply to: issues@concentric.net Organization: Issues & Views To: Upstream Subject: [Upstream] On propaganda Forwarded by: upstream-list@cycad.com > I have been a member of this list for over a year now and this is the first thing that I can remember that dealt with homosexuals. I was wondering, just what is the "propaganda of the homosexuals-- just as they preach it"? . . . . . . . . Anyway, I don't know what the "homosexual propaganda is". . . Ron Patterson =========================== Homosexual activists figured out that if they styled their cause along the lines of "civil rights" and used the same language employed by blacks in their quest for "equality," they would have greater success in getting their deviant behavior accepted as "normal." Because of my involvement in the early 70's women's movement, I got to listen in on some of this strategizing. At the time, most of us straights thought these people were baying at the moon and would never pull it off. Surely, we thought, the American people would never be induced to turn ALL tradition on its head! Ha! In terms of their propaganda, it begins first with their false claim (in order to magnify their importance) that as much as 10% of the population is "gay." It continues with the image of them as an "oppressed" put upon group, who want nothing more than to exercise their rights. Over the past two decades, it has become clear that that's the least of their agenda. They want primary policy making positions and have already attained such in many major organizations and institutions. The activists' goal has always been to intrude their notions and outlook on sexual relations into the consciousness of mainstream society. Homosexuals are among the wealthiest and most successful Americans. Although there will always be incidents of some flaky employer, homosexuals have a reputation for being reliable workers whose abilities are sought after. And although there may be a little old lady somewhere who won't rent her private home to them, most landlords I've met (including my current one) welcome homosexual tenants, who are known (a stereotype) for the excellent manner in which they maintain their premises. However, since Americans are now conditioned (thanks mainly to blacks) to be moved by sob stories about job and housing rejection, the "gays" must shape their platform and grievances along these lines. Stories about "discrimination" is what the typical American understands and grooves on. Oh, how Americans do love protecting the underdog! Homosexuals are in the forefront of those who have sexualized school curriculums and brazenly lie that this is not what they're doing. For obvious reasons, it's important to them that children fail to develop the kind of modesty and reserve (what they call "repression") that makes them resistant to early sexual experiences. Homosexuals are now so well positioned and have gained so much public "respectability" that they have moved to the next level of the agenda, that is outright challenges to the policies of organizations like the Boy Scouts. Why the Boy Scouts? (What's that smug "gay" saying?: "After eight, it's too late.") But, of course, it's not too late after eight. We all know of the vulnerability of boys at puberty, and this the homosexuals know best of all. What a ripe moment to enter a child's life and, via a corrupted school system and an overbearing media, motivate and proselytize him to engage in sexual experimentation. I think the discussion over whether or not homosexuality is biological is a pointless one. Who cares? There is probably some part of the population who are inherently drawn to their own sex. But then there is that other part of young people who aren't capable of fending off the advances of Mama's latest boyfriend or the seductions of an adult mentor or relative. How do we know the extent to which that first experience defines what sex is for them? I'm not going to take up more space on this list, since I wrote an article (In the Name of 'Civil Rights': Homosexuals Remake Society [1996]) that is on my website and goes further into the subject, with special emphasis on the impact on blacks. If you're interested, the website is: http://www.concentric.net/~issues Elizabeth -- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Issues & Views DEliz@aol.com and Issues@concentric.net http://www.concentric.net/~issues = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = --- This is a message from the Upstream mailing list. Visit the Upstream Website at http://cycad.com/cgi-bin/Upstream/ Visit the Upstream Mailing List archives at http://cycad.com/upstream-list-archive To subscribe to this list send email to the address upstream-list-request@cycad.com with just the subject subscribe To unsubscribe from this list send email to the address upstream-list-request@cycad.com with just the subject unsubscribe