\doc\web\99\01\tqm.txt Date sent: Tue, 19 Jan 1999 13:47:39 To: arthurhu@halcyon.com From: "Lynn M Stuter" Subject: Re: No Genital Exams for Preschoolers = platform agenda item? Not when you know how they define "ready to learn." In state documents, that term is defined as "arriving at school on the first day and every day thereafter ready to learn." Anything that might inhibit that readiness to learn, places the child at risk. Inhibiting facts are any of a number of things that might "stress" the child, such as failure to make friends, an argument with a parent or sibling, not having the "right" clothes to wear, being sexually molested. To this end, the state contends that it has a compelling interest in making sure that the raw material it receives is of good quality (ie, is ready to learn). Consider these quotes from Total Quality For Schools by Joseph C Fields, "Parents supply a resource to which educators apply a variety of processes. These processes include a thirteen-year sequence of assessments to match quality standards to develop a graduate who meets customer requirements." "The organization receiving the student is the customer. The organization will be the community and may be a university, a business, the military, a government service, or a marriage. ... This changes the role of parent to be one of a "vendor" of precious, incomparable resources to teachers." "Parents learn that they must provide the best ready-to-learn student possible." "Parents and students behave to please the teacher and to meet the teacher's requirements." "Building quality into the product in the first place in the field of education begins at home and continues into the design of the school's instructional environment. It may take collaborative effort between legislatures, local boards of education, and school administrators to design programs for parents who send their children to public schools. Building quality in at home is a personal social responsibility of pro-creating persons to all other Americans." Consider too the parent as "vendor of a precious resource, the child. In the internal customer concept, the parent is serving the teacher. Teachers could identify reasonable specifications for parents relative to the home learning environment and certify parents who will cooperate. Guardians and agencies would be included in the assurance of a well-prepared student to inquire, acquire, and require." "Citizens would no more be allowed to put obstacles in the way of public educators than to interfere with public medical, police, or fire protection personnel who are doing their duty." LynnS At 01:15 PM 1/19/99 -0800, you wrote: >It's a pretty big stretch from this language to routine gential exams! > >PART IX: READINESS TO LEARN > >NEW SECTION. Sec. 901. A new section is added to chapter 70.190 RCW to read as follows: > > (l) The legislature finds that helping children to arrive at school ready to learn is an important part of improving student learning. > > (2) To the extent funds are appropriated, the family policy council shall award grants to community-based consortiums that > submit comprehensive plans that include strategies to improve readiness to learn. > >