d:\doc\web\2002\11\histlit.txt At 06:16 PM 11/3/2002 -0600, Carol Holst wrote: 1. Were our pioneer ancestors really better educated than people are now? How do we prove our conclusions either way? Standardized test results are available beginning with the World War I generation. It's clear that students today are better, on the whole, than Americans were 80 years ago at the things those tests can measure. For earlier generations it is difficult to obtain a representative sample. Preserved writing samples tend to be from the relatively wealthy, and of course can tell us little about the prevalence of absolute illiteracy. Still, even a cursory survey of letters from the Civil War shows that the standard of spelling today is much higher than it was then. Or peruse, if you will, the journals of Lewis and Clark. For anyone seriously interested in the literacy of earlier generations of Americans, I recommend a book by Miles Meyers, Changing Our Minds: Negotiating English and Literacy, published by the National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois, 1996. Miles demonstrates that the definition of literacy (and thus, what schools have attempted to teach) has changed dramatically in the course of American history. As he documents, instructional objectives have been determined by social and economic conditions. The titles of some of his chapters outline earlier meanings of "literacy" in America: · From Oracy (or Face-to-Face Literacy) to Signature Literacy: 1660-1776); · Signature and Recording Literacy: 1776-1864; · Recitation and Report Literacy: 1864-1916; · A Literacy of Decoding, Defining, and Analyzing: 1916-1983; · The Transition to a New Standard of Literacy: 1960-1983; He has amassed a great deal of evidence that in the four score and seven years between the Declaration of Independence and Lincoln's Gettysburg Address most Americans were capable of little more than signing their name. During the next fifty years, public schools attempted to assimilate large numbers of immigrants by teaching students to memorize texts with patriotic and Anglo-Saxon cultural themes (but not necessarily to "read," in the sense of being able to look at an unfamiliar text and say what it means). By the time of the First World War, the Army needed recruits able to read basic directions. Many could not even read signs and labels, so schools embarked on a program of teaching reading as decoding. George Sheridan Northside School Cool, California 95614